Lusha vs Kaspr (2026)

Multi-source contact tool vs. LinkedIn-only extractor. Lusha has more data sources. Kaspr is LinkedIn-focused.

Lusha wins this one
Lusha has a larger database, works beyond LinkedIn, and offers list building and CRM enrichment. Kaspr is LinkedIn-only at $45/user/mo vs. Lusha's $29/user/mo. Both have Chrome extensions. Lusha does more for less.
7.2

Lusha

7.2

Kaspr

6.0
Feature Lusha Winner Kaspr
API accessYesYes
CRM enrichmentYesNo
CRM exportNoYes
Chrome extensionYesNo
Company profilesYesNo
Contact finderYesNo
Email finderNoYes
LinkedIn Chrome extensionNoYes
List buildingYesNo
Phone number finderNoYes
Team managementNoYes
Starting Price$29/user/mo$45/user/mo
Sultan's Score7.26.0

The Sultan's Verdict

Lusha has a larger database, works beyond LinkedIn, and offers list building and CRM enrichment. Kaspr is LinkedIn-only at $45/user/mo vs. Lusha's $29/user/mo. Both have Chrome extensions. Lusha does more for less.

Pricing Deep Dive

Lusha offers 4 tiers: Free at $0 (5 credits/mo), Pro at $29/user/mo, Premium at $51/user/mo, Scale at Custom. The entry point sits at $29/user/mo, which lands it in the budget range for this category.

Kaspr prices across 4 tiers: Free at $0 (5 credits/mo), Starter at $45/user/mo, Business at $79/user/mo, Organization at $99/user/mo. Starting at $45/user/mo, it falls into the mid bracket.

When you stack the two side by side, Lusha at $29/user/mo vs Kaspr at $45/user/mo, the question isn't which costs less. It's which gives you more per dollar for your specific workflow. A cheaper tool that doesn't fit your process costs more in lost productivity than a pricier one that does.

Where Lusha Wins

Dead simple Chrome extension. This is one of the key reasons Lusha takes the overall win in this matchup. For teams that prioritize this, Lusha delivers where Kaspr can't match it.

Good direct phone number coverage. This is one of the key reasons Lusha takes the overall win in this matchup. For teams that prioritize this, Lusha delivers where Kaspr can't match it.

Affordable per-seat pricing. This is one of the key reasons Lusha takes the overall win in this matchup. For teams that prioritize this, Lusha delivers where Kaspr can't match it.

Lusha scores 7.2/10 overall, with particular strength in Individual reps and small teams wanting quick contact lookups from LinkedIn.

Where Kaspr Wins

Simple LinkedIn data extraction. If this matters to your team, Kaspr has a clear edge over Lusha.

GDPR-compliant. If this matters to your team, Kaspr has a clear edge over Lusha.

Good European phone number coverage. If this matters to your team, Kaspr has a clear edge over Lusha.

Kaspr scores 6.0/10 and works best for European sales reps wanting quick LinkedIn contact extraction.

Where Lusha Falls Short

Smaller database than ZoomInfo. This is a real limitation, and it's worth weighing before you commit. If this is a dealbreaker for your team, Kaspr might be the better pick.

Limited enrichment beyond basic contact data. This is a real limitation, and it's worth weighing before you commit. If this is a dealbreaker for your team, Kaspr might be the better pick.

Credit limits on lower tiers. This is a real limitation, and it's worth weighing before you commit. If this is a dealbreaker for your team, Kaspr might be the better pick.

Where Kaspr Falls Short

LinkedIn-only, no standalone database. Worth considering seriously, especially if your use case leans on the areas where Kaspr is weakest. Lusha handles this better.

Limited functionality beyond contact extraction. Worth considering seriously, especially if your use case leans on the areas where Kaspr is weakest. Lusha handles this better.

Credit limits at lower tiers. Worth considering seriously, especially if your use case leans on the areas where Kaspr is weakest. Lusha handles this better.

Who Should Choose What

You're watching every dollar. Go with Lusha (starting at $29/user/mo). It covers the core functionality without the sticker shock. You can always upgrade or switch later once you've outgrown it.

You need the deepest feature set. Lusha takes this one. Its standout strengths include dead simple chrome extension and good direct phone number coverage. If you're willing to pay for completeness, Lusha won't leave you wanting.

You have a specific workflow in mind. Kaspr is built for European sales reps wanting quick LinkedIn contact extraction. If that describes your team, Kaspr might be the better fit despite the overall scores. Tools are only as good as the match between their design and your process.

How We Compared These Tools

We evaluated Lusha and Kaspr across pricing, features, ease of use, and real-world fit for small teams. Scores reflect hands-on testing and documented feature sets, not vendor marketing. Pricing data is current as of our last review and may change. We don't accept payment for placement or scores.

Is Lusha or Kaspr better in 2026?

The Sultan picks Lusha. Lusha scores 7.2/10 and Kaspr scores 6.0/10. The right choice depends on your team size, budget, and workflow needs.

How does Lusha pricing compare to Kaspr?

Lusha starts at $29/user/mo and Kaspr starts at $45/user/mo. Both offer different value at their price points, so compare features against your actual use case before committing.

Can I switch from Lusha to Kaspr easily?

Most teams can migrate between Lusha and Kaspr within a few weeks. Export your data, map fields to the new platform, and plan for a 1-2 week overlap period where both tools run in parallel.